244 Matching Results

Search Results

prev Results: 73 - 96 next

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, August 29, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles stating the only place the work can be done in reasonable time is in St. Paul. Pearson states the law company's suggested compensation plan, and that they will pay for transportation costs.
Date: August 29, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from P. O. Settle to John Sayles, July 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from P. O. Settle to John Sayles discussing the Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company case. Settle remits a check for $50.00 to cover legal fees.
Date: July 18, 1932
Creator: Settle, P. O.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, September 8, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles acknowledging compensation request and also stating its impracticability. The letter requests a personal interview.
Date: September 8, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson, December 12, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to J. E. Pearson stating they do not share the same viewpoint on the inclusion of the forms, as Sayles would be dissatisfied if the forms were not included. Sayles also expresses concerns about the weather in St. Paul.
Date: December 12, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to N. E. Fielding, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to N. E. Fielding moving to delay the Sam Underwood et al. v. Gulf Refining Company case hearing until July 11, 1932. T. H. Neel telegraphed Sayles about the case, but Sayles is not sure he is Fielding's attorney.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 3, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company case. The plea of privilege has not yet been filed.
Date: June 3, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles, August 1, 1932]

Description: Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles discussing the hurdles to agreement on the royalties contract. Also mentioned is projected sales within two years.
Date: August 1, 1932
Creator: Wilhoit, M. B.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Perry Sayles to H. J. Scott, August 12, 1932]

Description: Letter from Perry Sayles, likely Perry Sayles, to H. J. Scott discussing the transferred deeds of a property in Eastland, Texas from Sayles, to Joe Driskell, to G. N. Quirl.
Date: August 12, 1932
Creator: Sayles, Perry
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from H. J. Scott to Perry Sayles, August 10, 1932]

Description: Letter from H. J. Scott to Perry Sayles discussing the deeds of a property in Eastland, Texas that Perry Sayles sold to Joe Driskell. Scott is requesting the documentation of the deeds to see the exact details. There are handwritten addresses and dates on in the top left corner of the letter.
Date: August 10, 1932
Creator: Scott, H. J.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles, November 21, 1932]

Description: Letter from M. B. Wilhoit to John Sayles stating his pleasure in knowing Sayles will be on the job in St. Paul, and the marketability of the work that is to be created. Wilhoit mentions judges he has spoken to who have notes that might be included in the work Sayles is to write and discusses forms to not be included.
Date: November 21, 1932
Creator: Wilhoit, M. B.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel, May 3, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel discussing the Sam Underwood vs. Gulf Refining Company case. Sayles states the case has been dismissed and N. E. Fielding is not required to appear. The Gulf Refining Company has taken a nonsuit.
Date: May 3, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, May 2, 1932]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles moving to take non-suit in Sam Underwood's case against the Gulf Refining Company. Stephens has no objection against the case being transferred to the 104th district court and requests Sayles enter the county court orders.
Date: May 2, 1932
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from Wilfrid E. Lessing to John Sayles, July 8, 1932]

Description: Letter from Wilfrid E. Lessing to John Sayles discussing the Sam Underwood vs Gulf Refining Company case. Mr. Lessing encloses a copy of the plaintiff's plea of misjoinder.
Date: July 8, 1932
Creator: Lessing, Wilfrid E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to Tom K. Eplen, March 1,1932]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to Tom K. Eplen that encloses a brief on the question of necessary parties in the case of Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company.
Date: March 1, 1932
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, August 11,1932]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing that Mr. Stephens is sending a check for $90.45 to cover judgement for a case, as well as a check for cost. The case he mentions is the case of Sam Underwood et al vs Gulf Refining Company.
Date: August 11, 1932
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, May 4,1932]

Description: Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing the citation that will be served to N. E. Fielding. Stephens add that Fielding will file a plea of privilege and ask Sayles to send a copy once the document has been filed.
Date: May 4, 1932
Creator: Stephens, David W.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to M. S. Long, May 3,1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to M. S. Long discussing a form that sustains the plea that N. E. Fielding is a necessary party defendant in the case. John Sayles had been previously contacted to move the case of Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company to the 104th distract court in which David W. Stephens is in agreement with.
Date: May 3, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles, November 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from J. E. Pearson to John Sayles discussing the contract for Sayles' work and its provisions. Pearson also asks Sayles for his ideas about forms.
Date: November 18, 1932
Creator: Pearson, J. E.
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit, October 21, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to M. B. Wilhoit discussing possible restrictions for publishing as well as selling prices. Sayles also mentions proposed compensation plans.
Date: October 21, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, February 6,1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the settlement for the case of Gulf Pipe Line Company vs A. D. Fulton. Sayles goes on to mention that this particular suit went on for 4 years and he believes a fair fee for his time is $150.00.
Date: February 6, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, January 8,1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing changes to be made to a previous communication from Stephens. Sayles encloses a draft to be looked over and if the changes are made the settlement can be closed.
Date: January 8, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 7,1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Sam Underwood et al vs Gulf Refining Company case. Mr. Sayles writes that a Miss Wellborn mailed Mr. Stephens a copy of Fielding's plea of privilege. The trail date has been set by the court for July 11th.
Date: June 7, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen