205 results that matched your query. Showing page 4 of 11.
..., total...$5,584,000 No. farms, 1964......395 Mineral value..$7,838,600 Farm income...$4,454,995 Economic... (da.).233 No. farms, 1959.....1,010 No. farms, 1964..... 1,026 Farm income... $2,707,385 Auto reg., No... Growing season (da.).235 No. farms, 1959......868 No. farms, 1964.......775 Farm income..$12,079,144 SAN
.... farms, 1964......707 Mineral value.$18,136,710 Farm income..$13,542,346 Economic index....0.201..., 1959......673 No. farms, 1964......547 Farm income.. 516.490.696 Auto reg., No....... 4,729 Registered voters..... $58,085,000 No. farms, 1964..... 2,418 Mineral value..$5,253,567 Farm income.. $19,303,459 Economic
.... avg.......96 Growing season (da.).280 No. farms, 1959.... 1,284 No. farms, 1964.....1,200 Farm income..., 1964.......18 Mineral value.$88,584,710 Farm income .... $613,165 Economic index..... 0.511 s4,) .91LL3 - "........... 96 Growing season (da.).220 No. farms, 1959.....1,468 No. farms, 1964.....1,453 Farm
..., in a general shift of titles in 1964, he voluntarily relinquished his position as chairman of the board..., 1955-60; vicechairman of the board of directors, 1960-64; and chairman of the board since 1964. Joe M
... NUMBER OF FARMS, ACREAGE, SIZE AND VALUE Source: U. S. Census of Agriculture, 1964 Average Size No... (Acres) (Acres) (Per Farm) I (Per Acre) Counties- 1964 1959 < 1964... 1959 1964 1959 1964 1959 1964 1959 Anderson............. 1,6431 1,6291 6828001
.... farms, 1964.... 1,283 Mineral value.... $153,900 Farm income...$6,922,477 Economic index.....0.056.... farms, 1964.......762 Mineral value..$5,926,879 Farm income.. $3,804,689 Economic index.....0.062..... $20,352,000 No. farms, 1964.......765 Mineral value.S13,594,300 Farm income... $4,822,032 Economic
... Growing season (da.).235 No, farms, 1959.....1,105 No. farms, 1964.....1,001 Farm income...$7,105,490 Auto... (da.).230 No. farms, 1959.... 2,503 No. farms, 1964......2,07 Farm income..$14,765,363 Auto reg., No... temp. avg........ 99 Growing season (da.).212 No. farms, 1959.......710 No. farms, 1964.......586 Farm
... Growing season (da.).233 No. farms, 1959.......842 No. farms, 1964.......626 Farm income.. .$4,309,500.......... 34 July temp. avg....... 96 Growing season (da.).226 No. farms, 1959. 1,863 No. farms, 1964..., 1964.......601 Farm income.$36,802,285
.......... 94 Growing season (da.).213 No. farms, 1959......953 No. farms, 1964......832 Farm... (da.).219 No. farms, 1959.......369 No. farms, 1964......318 Farm income...$3,919,058 Auto reg... No. farms, 1964.... 1,713 Farm income. $19,952,441 Auto reg., No.....16,451 Registered voters...8,798
... (da.).208 No. farms, 1959.... 1,736 No. farms, 1964..... 1,516 Farm income.. $55,140,983 Auto reg..., 1959......461 Income total...$8,707,000 No. farms, 1964......390 Mineral value. .$2,273,562 Farm income..., 1959.......11 Income, total ....$556,000 No. farms, 1964.......20 Mineral value.$11,569,800 Farm income
........ 1,528 No. farms, 1964.... 1,347 Farm income...$3,79,197 Auto reg., No...... 5,679 Registered....... 1,618 No. farms, 1964..... 1,605 Farm income, .. $9,555,904 Auto reg., No......11,289 Registered..., 1964......783 Farm income.. $38,482,906 Auto reg., No...... 4,557 Registered voters...2,689 No. employed
... value.....$36,520,650 No. farms, 1959......559 Income, total..$16,371,000 No. farms, 1964......520 Mineral..., 1959......488 No. farms, 1964.......407 Farm income...$3,275,440 Auto reg., No.......3,964 Registered... (da.).224 No. farms, 1959.......75 No. farms, 1964.......63 Farm income...$1,827,156 STERLING CITY (850
.... farms, 1959.....1,421 No. farms, 1964.....1,331 Farm income...$35,237,455 Auto reg., No ..... 7,682.... farms, 1964.......279 Mineral value.$62,016,894 Farm income..$6,544,170 Economic index.....0.368... Growing season (da.).216 No. farms, 1959......772 No. farms, 1964......762 Farm income..$4,854,904 0W
... with 3,945,300 in 1964. Texas plants in 1965 used 50,906,000,000 cubic feet of natural gas, valued at $7,005,000...) Value 1965............ 1,172,693,000 $87,495,000 1964............ 1,165,593,000... ................... I 9,229,4531 18,808,2431 49.1 1963......... ........ 10,228,1431 20,842,211! 49.1 1964
... Growing season (da.).237 No. farms, 1959.....1,480 No. farms, 1964.....1,305 Farm income...$2,119,977 Auto... (da.).193 No. farms, 1959.......753 No. farms, 1964.......645 Farm income.. $37,014,825 Auto reg
... years was: 905 million bushels in 1965, 910 million in 1964, 919 million in 1963, 915 million in 1962..., San Patricio 8,840,- 000 and Hansford 8,689,500. The 1964 Census showed 11,289,776,483 pounds
... Growing season (da.).247 No. farms, 1959....2,151 No. farms, 1964.... 1,925 Farm income..$24,692,843 Auto.... avg.......96 Growing season (da.).232 No. farms, 1959.......603 No. farms, 1964......556 Farm.... avg.......93 Growing season (da.).196 No. farms, 1959.....1,3105 No. farms, 1964.....1,028 Farm income
... (da.).233 No. farms, 1959.....1,972 No. farms, 1964.....1,780 Farm income..$12,276,373 Auto reg., No... (da.).223 No. farms, 1959..... 1,202 No. farms, 1964.....1,120 Farm income..$11,175,909 Auto reg., No..., 1959......729 No. farms, 1964......669 Farm income .$7,773,135 Auto reg., No..... 11,095 Registered
.... avg.......96 Growing season (da.).232 No. farms, 1959........51 No. farms, 1964........38 Farm income.... farms, 1964......523 Mineral value.......... Farm income... $9,997,047 Economic index.....0.096..., 1964... 1..181 Farm income... $4,225,178 Auto reg., No.......9,861 Registered voters...6,312 No
... in December, 1966. This compared with $107.53 weekly a year earlier, $103.32 in December, 1964, and $99.19... at the end of 1966, compared with end-of-year averages of $127.41 in 1965, $121.13 in 1964 and $122.54... for 1963 and 1964 appear on Page 464 In the 1966-67 edition of the Texas Almanac. Source: Texas Employment
When this item was originally scanned, we used Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology to "read" and save text embedded in the image. OCR is not fool-proof, however. While the overall quality of the OCR results is generally good, the results may vary depending on legibility of the original materials.