The New Ulm Enterprise (New Ulm, Tex.), Vol. 75, No. 29, Ed. 1 Thursday, May 16, 1985 Page: 4 of 6
This newspaper is part of the collection entitled: New Ulm Enterprise and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the Nesbitt Memorial Library.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
PAGE 4 THE NEW ULM ENTERPRISE THURSDAY. MAY U. INI
★ Legal Notice*
LEGAL NOTICE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
WALKER-MATAGORDA ± 400 KV HVdc
TRANSMISSION LINE
The Central Power and Light Company, Houston Lighting and
Power Company, and Southwestern Electric Power Company
propose to construct and operate a single circuit ± 400,000 volt
(± 400 kV) high voltage direct current (HVdc) transmission line
from the existing Walker County Station in Walker County to the
Matagorda Station at-the South Texas Project (STP) in Matagorda
.County. The project will also include associated terminal equip-,
ment. In 1983, an Application for a Certificate of Convenience
and Necosity'(CCN) for the Walker-Matagorda line and associa-
ted terminal equipment was filed with the Public Utility
Commission of Texas (PUC). Subsequent to public hearings, the
taking of testimony, and staff review, the PUC issued an Order of
Remand on September 18, 1984, in Docket 5023. Hearings on
routes proposed and described below will be held in such docket.
As a result of stipulations in that Order, this notice is hereby
published for a route with modifications which have been deve-
loped from the original alignment. This modified route will be the
basis for Application for Certification from the PUC. It will
measure approximately 156.6 miles in length and will be located in
seven counties: Walker, Grimes, Waller, Harris, Austin, Wharton,
and Matagorda.
The location of the route can be described as follows: commenc-
ing at the Walker County Station, the route proceeds in basic south-
westerly direction for approximately 21.9 miles to the general area
of existing Grimes Station, where it turns to a more southerly
heading. Specifically, the route exits the Walker County Station
and proceeds south for 0.1 mile; thence southwest 2.5 miles to the
45°-angle crossing of Interstate 45 midway between two rest areas;
thence south and southwest 0.6 mile crossing U.S. 75 at a point ap-
proximately 0.83 mile north of the entrance to Petree Cemetery. It
is in this area, approximately 0.2 mile west of Interstate 45, that the
route is situated immediately adjacent and parallel to (on the nor-
thwest side) an existing 345 kV electric transmission line. It main-
tains this parallel alignment in a southwest direction for approxi-
mately 4.2 miles, crossing Nelson Creek, and FM 1696 at a point 0.5
mile west of the highway’s intersection with Roberts Road. Appro-
ximately 0.3 mile south of FM 1696, the route, maintaining the
parallel, turns to the west and proceeds for 1.2 miles; thence turns
southwest for 3.3 miles, crossing Hopewell Road, an existing pipe-
line, and Hopewell Road again approximately 0.82 mile west from
the point where the pipeline intersects Hopewell Road; thence
south-southwest for 1.6 miles; thence southwest again for 2.2 miles,
still maintaining the parallel and crossing the West Fork of the San
Jacinto River, and the Walker-Grimes County Line approximately
1.34 miles north of State Highway 30; thence southwest 2.3 miles
before leaving the parallel alignment and crossing an existing
pipeline. Total mileage for the parallel of the existing transmission
line is approximately 15 miles. (Along and in the vicinity of this
parallel alignment, an alternate route has been located. It is from
0.05 mile to 0.9 mile southeast of the proposed route.) At the point
where the proposed route leaves the parallel alignment, it turns
west-southwest for 1.7 miles, crossing FM 2620 approximately 0.44
mile south of Independence Church and 1.34 miles north of the FM
2620-State Highway 30 intersection; thence southwest 2.2 miles to a
point 0.19 mile south of the Fort Worth and Denver Railroad track
in the general area of the Grimes Station (located approximately
one mile northwest of the community of Shiro, Texas).
From the Grimes Station area, the route proceeds in south-
southwest direction for approximately 19.3 miles to a point where it
crosses State Highway 105 east of Navasota, Texas. Specifically, at a
point 0.1 mile south of the Fort Worth and Denver Railroad and
0.4 mile west of the Grimes Station, the route proceeds south-
southwest for 1.9 miles to a point where it intersects an existing 345
kV transmission line; thence turns southeast and parallels the exist-
ing transmission line of the northeast side for approximately 0.8
mile, crossing State Highway 30 approximately 1.38 miles east of
the community of Roans Prairie. Approximately 0.11 mile south of
the State Highway 30 crossing, the route turns south for 0.5 mile
and then south-southwest to parallel an existing 138 kV transmis-
sion line. (In the immediate area south of State Highway 30, a short
alternate route has been located within 0.02 mile east of the
proposed route.) The west-side parallel of the existing 138 kV tran-
smission line measures approximately 6.4 miles. (Along the 6.4 mile
parallel alignment, a short alternate route has been located within
0.1 mile west of the proposed route.) A short segment, 0.1 mile,
enables the route to cross FM 149 approximately 1.34 miles east of
the State Highway 90-FM 149 intersection. The route continues to
the south-southwest 0.8 mile where it crosses FM1774 approximate-
ly 1.23 miles east of the State Highway 90-FM 1774 intersection in
Anderson, Texas; thence 6.4 miles south to a point 0.46 mile north
of Pilgrim Point Church where the route merges with and parallels
an existing 138 kV transmission line; thence south 1.0 mile along
the parallel to a point where the existing transmission line turns to
the southwest; thence south 1.4 miles to the crossing point of State
Highway 105, said crossing point located approximately 0.87 mile
east of St. Martinville Church and approximately 1.36 miles west of
the State Highway 105-FM 1748 intersection. (From FM 149 to State
Highway 105 several alternate routes have been developed being
located up to 0.2 mile west and 0.6 mile east of the proposed route.)
The next major segment extends from State Highway 105 to U.S.
Highway 290, a distance of approximately 21.8 miles. Immediately
south of the State Highway 105 crossing, the route crosses the Mis-
souri Pacific Railroad; thence 0.4 mile to the crossing of the Santa
Fe Railway; thence due south for 2.1 miles to a point 1.14 miles
north of the community of Whitehall, where the route turns to the
southeast; thence southeast 2.9 miles, crossing Beason Creek, to a
point along an existing pipeline; thence due south parallel to and
on the west side of the pipeline for 5.2 miles, crossing into Waller
County; thence south-southwest, leaving the existing pipeline, for
0.7 mile to the crossing of FM 362, said crossing located ap-
proximately 0.68 mile south and east of the FM 362-FM 2979 inter-
section; thence continuing south-southwest for 4.0 miles to the
crossing of Spring Creek and the Waller-Harris County Line, said
crossing located approximately 0.23 northwest of FM 362; thence
continuing south-southwest into Harris County for 0.3 mile to the
crossing of FM 362 appoximately 0.63 mile from the FM 362-
FM1736 intersection; thence continuing south-southwest from the
FM 362 crossing for 0.4 mile to a point where the route turns to the
southwest and proceeds 0.3 mile and leaves Harris County, re-
entering Waller County. Total length of the proposed route in
Harris County measures approximately one mile. Continuing
southwest from the Harris-Walker County Line for almost 0.2
mile, the route crosses FM 362 approximately 0.59 mile south of the
FM 362-FM 1736 intersection; thence continuing southwest for 1.2
miles to a point where the route turns due south; thence due south
for approximately 4.1 miles to the U.S. Highway 290 crossing, said
crossing located approximately 1.57 miles east of the U.S. 290
FM1098 intersection and 2.08 miles west of the U.S. 290-FM 362 in-
tersection. The route is situated approximately one mile east of the
community of Prairie View and two miles west of the corporate
limits of die city of Waller. (From State Highway 105 to U.S.
Highway 290, several alternate routes have been located. They ex-
tend up to 0.2 mile east and 3.4 miles west of the proposed route.)
The route proceeds tn a south-southwest direction, incorporating
several angles, from I’.S. 290 to th, tru -.ns, of the Brazos River
and Interstate 10.1 otal length of this portion of the route measures
approximately 22.9 miles. As the route crosses U.S. 290, it immedi-
ately crams the Southern Pacific Railroad and continues due south
for 0.8 mile, erasing Mound Creek; thence continuing due south
for approximately 4.8 miles to the crossing of-Rochen Road, said
crossing located approximately 0.53 mile east of the Rochen Road-
Blinka Road intersection; thence south almost 0.2 mile from the
Rochen Road crossing to a point where the route turns to the
southwest; thence southwest for approximately 0.9 mile to the
crossing point of Blinka Road, said erasing located approximately
0.59 mile north of the Blinka Road-Monaville Road intersection;
thence continuing southwest for 0.9 mile to the erasing point of
Monaville Road, said crossing located approximately 0.55 mile east
of the Monaville Road-Prairie View South Road intersection;
thence continuing southwest approximately 0.6 mile to a point just
east of Prairie View South Road, where the route turns due south
and is parallel and adjacent to said road for 0.9 mile; thence angling
south-southwest for 2.3 miles to the crossing point of FM 529,
crossing Prairie View South Road twice at a corner, the second
erasing being less than 0.06 mile east of the Prairie View South
Road-Morgan Road intersection, crossing Prairie View South Road
again approximately 0.12 mile south of the road’s intersection with
Morgan Road, crossing Bell Road 0.09 mile west of the Bell Road-
Prairie View South Road intersection, fnd crossing Bessies Creek
just north of FM 529. The FM 529 crossing occurs 1.2 miles east of
the FM 529-Fm 359 intersection. The route continues southwest for
approximately 1.8 miles where it crosses FM 359, said crossing loca-
ted 1.61 miles south-southeast of the FM 359-FM529 intersection;
thence, with slight deflections to the south-southwest before and af-
ter crossing 359, the route proceeds for 2.6 miles to a point situated
almost 0.08 mile northwest of the corner of Nieman Road, where
the route then turns to the south-southeast; thence south-southeast
for 0.8 mile to a point just west of Nieman Road, where the route
turns back to the south-southwest and parallels Nieman Road on
the west side for 0.8 mile to a point 0.13 mile north of the Nieman
Road-FM 1458 intersection, where the route turns due south; then-
ce south for approximately 0.7 mile, crossing Nieman Road, Dry
Branch, and FM 1458 all within less than 0.09 mile from Wade's
Chapel; thence turning southwest again and proceeding 1.2 miles
and crossing Irons Creek approximately 1.63 miles upstream from
its confluence with the Brazos River; thence continuing southwest
for approximately 1.1 miles to the crossing of the Brazos River, said
crossing located approximately 2.2 miles upstream and north of the
river’s intersection with Interstate 10; thence southwest for approx-
imately 2.5 miles to the crossing point of the Missouri Kansas Texas
Railroad and Interstate 10, said crossing located 6.4 miles west of
the FM 1489-1-10 interchange and 2.1 miles east of the FM 1458-1-
10 interchange. (Between U.S. Highway 290 and Interstate 10,
several alternate routes have been located. They extend up to 2.0
miles east and 2.3 miles west of the proposed route.)
From Interstate 10 to the San Bernard River, the route proceeds
in a southwesterly direction for approximately 12.6 miles. South of
1-10, it continues to the southwest for approximately 1.5 miles
before turning more westerly; thence less than 0.1 mile to the
crossing of FM1458, said crossing approximately 0.28 mile north-
west of the community of Frydek; thence west-southwest for 0.4
mile to a point where the route turns back to the southwest; thence
southwest for approximately 4.0 miles to the crossing of Allens
Creek, the Santa Fe Railway and State Highway 36, said crossing
approximately 2.5 miles south of the State Highway 36-FM 3013 in-
tersection, approximately 4.0 miles south of the community of
Sealy, and approximately 6.0 miles north of the corporate limits of
the city of Wallis. After crossing State Highway 36, the route
proceeds southwesterly fo 2.6 miles to a point where it turns due
south; thence south approximately 0.7 mile to a crossing of Hog
Branch; thence continuing south approximately 1.2 miles to the
crossing point of East Bernard Creek; thence continuing south 2.1
miles to the crossing point of the San Bernard River (and the
Austin-Wharton County Line), said crossing approximately 1.6
miles upstream (west) from the FM 1093 bridge over the river.
(From Interstate 10 to the San Bernard River, several alternate
routes have been located. They extend up to approximately 1.6
miles east and 0.6 mile west of the proposed route.)
From the San Bernard River to U.S. Highway 59, the route’s
basic direction is south, extending approximately 26.3 miles. Speci-
fically, after crossing the San Bernard River, the route proceeds for
approximately 0.8 mile to the crossing point of FM 1093 and the
Southern Pacific Railroad, said crossing approximately 2.27 miles
east of the hamlet of Chesterville; thence continuing due south for
approximately 2.6 miles to a crossing of Middle Bernard Creek;
thence south approximately 0.5 mile to a point where the route
turns to the southeast; thence southeast approximately 2.1 miles to
the crossing point of U.S. Highway 90A and the Southern Pacific
Railroad, said crossing approximately 3.5 miles east of the commu-
nity of Lissie and 0.89 mile west of the U.S. 90A-FM 1164 intersec-
tion;thence continuing southeast approximately 1.6 miles to the
crossing of West Bernard Creek and a turning point; thence tur-
ning due south and proceeding 6.3 miles to the crossing of Clarks
Branch; thence continuing south approximately 0.8 mile to a tur-
ning point; thence turning south-southwest and proceeding appro-
ximately 1.3 miles to the crossing of FM 1161, said crossing approx-
imately 0.28 mile east of the community of Spanish Camp; thence
continuing south-southwest approximately 0.8 mile to the crossing
of Peach Creek, said crossing 0.78 mile due east of the FM 640-FM
1161 intersection; thence continuing south-southwest 1.7 miles to
the crossing point of FM 640, said crossing approximately 1.3 miles
north of the FM 640-FM 102 intersection. In this area, the route
parallels FM 640 on the east side for approximately 0.4 mile before
the crossing, at a distance of less than 0.1 mile. The route then con-
tinues in a south-southwest direction for approximately 1.1 miles to
its crossing of FM 102, said crossing approximately 0.66 mile east of
the community of Glen Flora and approximately 0.36 mile west of
the FM 102-FM 640 intersection; thence continuing south-south-
west immediately crossing the Santa Fe Railway and proceeding 1.0
mile to the crossing point of the Colorado River; thence continu-
ing south-southwest for approximately 0.3 mile to a turning point.
The route then turns due south, proceeding 1.7 miles to the
crossing point of FM 961, said crossing approximately 2.2 miles east
of Crescent School and 3.6 miles west of the FM 961-U.S. Highway
59 interchange; thence continuing south 0.9 mile to the crossing of
the East Fork of Jones Creek; thence continuing south approxima*
tely 2.8 miles to the crossing point of U.S. 59, said crossing approxi-
mately 0.56 mile northeast of the community of Pierce. (From the
San Bernard River to U.S. Highway 59, several alternate routes
have been located. They extend up to approximately 1.9 miles east
and 0.3 mile west of the proposed route.)
The route then proceeds from U.S. Highway 59 to the South
Texas Project in a south and southeast direction for approximately
31.8 miles. Specifically, as the route crosses U.S. 59, it then im-
mediately crosses the Southern Pacific Railroad and proceeds due
south approximately 0.1 mile to the crossing of Jones Creek; thence
continuing south 2.2 miles to a turning point; thence turning to the
southeast and proceeding approximately 1.7 miles to another tur-
ning point; thence turning due south again and proceeding appro-
ximately 1.4 miles to the erasing of Blue Creek. (From U.S. 59 to
Blue Creek, an alternate route has been located. It extends up to
approximately 0.2 mile east and 0.2 mile west of the proposed route
at various locations.) From Blue Creek, the route proceeds due
south for approximately 4.6 miles to the crossing of the Tres
Palacios River. (Approximately 0.5 mile south of Blue Creek, it
parallels FM 1162 for 2.0 miles, being located 0.25 mile east of the
road and the Tres Palacios School.) From the Tres Palacios River
crossing, the route continues due south for approximately 4.0 miles
to the Wharton-Matagorda County Line, said crossing approxi-
mately 2.6 miles from the County Line-State Highway 71 intersec-
tion. (An alternate route has been located in the area between the
Tres Palacios River and Wharton-Matagorda County Line. It ex-
tends approximately 0.1 mile to the east of the proposed toute.)
From the County Line, the route continues south 2.7 miles to the
crossing point of FM 1468, said erasing approximately 2.33 miles
east of th FM 1468-State Highway 71 interxection and approxima-
tely 1.72 miles west of the community of Clemville; thence continu-
ing south approximately 2.5 miles and making a slight deflection to
the south-southwest; thence proceeding south-southwest for appro-
ximately 0.6 mile to a turning point along three existing transmis-
sion lines; thence turning sou:' ■>• •• , ...» kuuan r ...
mission lines on their not th side and, proceeding approximately 1.^1
miles to the crossing of the Tres Palacios River, and the Southern
Pacific Railroad; thence continuing the southeast naralM for ap-
proximately 2.8 miles to the crossing point of State Highway 35,
said erasing approximately 0.72 mile northeast of the State High-
way 35-FM 1095 intersection. (An alternate route has been located
in the area of this initial parallel segment. It is situated approxi-
mately 0.3 mile north of the proposed route with a new river
crossing.) From the State Highway 35 crossing, the route continues
southeast, alongside the existing transmissiot lines, for ap-
proximately 1.5 miles to the crossing of the Missouri Pacific Rail-
road, said crossing approximately 1.86 miles west of where the
railroad crosses Wilson Creek. (In the vicinity of this railroad cros-
sing, an alternate route has been located. It extends up to appro-
ximately 0.2 mile northeast of the proposed route.) From the rail-
road crossing, the route continues southeast for 2.6 miles to a
crossing of Wilson Creek; thence southeast, maintaining the
parallel with the existing transmission lines, for approximately 4.0
miles to enter the South Texas Project and terminate at the
Matagorda Station.
A major alternate route has been located approximately 10 miles
to the east of the southern half of the proposed route, extending
through portions of Waller, Fort Bend, Wharton, and Matagorda
Counties. Total length of the alternate is approximately 76.2 miles,
and can be described as follows: commencing at a point approxi-
mately 1.6 miles northwest of the city of Pattison, the alternate ex-
tends south approximately 15.3 miles to the Brazos River. Specifi-
cally, at a point just north of FM 1458, the alternate route begins.
It proceeds to the southeast, crossing FM 1458 approximately 0.09
mile east of the FM 1458-Nieman Road intersection, for 1.9 miles to
a turning point (crossing Dry Branch once and Bessies Creek
twice); thence turning basically south and proceeding ap-
proximately 1.3 miles to the crossing of Bessies Bayou; thence con-
tinuing basically south for approximately 1.1 miles to its crossing
point of the Missouri Kansas Texas Railroad and Interstate 10, said
crossing approximately 0.85 mile west of the I-10-Donigan Road in-
terchange; thence continuing south 0.9 mile to a turning point 0.17
mile south of Donigan Road; thence turning to the southeast and
proceeding 0.6 mile, crossing Bessies Creek twice; thence con-
tinuing southeast approximately 0.7 mile to a turning point; thence
turning due south and proceeding approximately 0.8 mile to the
crossing point of FM 1489, said crossing approximately 0.37 mile
west of Bessies Creek; thence continuing south for approximately
2.5 miles to a crossing of Bessies Creek, said crossing approximately
0.28 mile east from the FM 1489 bridge over Bessies Creek; thence
south approximately 0.4 mile to a turning point (to the southwest)
and a crossing of FM 1489, said crossing approximately 1.33 miles
north of the FM 1489-FM 1093 intersection in the community of
Simonton; thence southwest approximately 0.3 mile to another
crossing of Bessies Creek; thence southwest approximately 0.2 mile
to a turning point; thence turning due south and proceeding appro-
ximately 0.9 mile to another turning point located 0.08 mile north
of FM 1093; thence turning southwest, crossing FM 1093 0.78 mile
west of the FM 1093-FM 1489 intersection in Simonton, and
proceeding 0.5 mile to a turning point; thence turning due south
and proceeding approximately 2.1 miles to a turning point on the
north side of an existing pipeline right-of-way; thence turning
southwest parallel to the pipeline and proceeding 0.7 mile to a tur-
ning point; thence turning due south again and proceeding ap-
proximately 0.4 mile to its crossing of the Brazos River, said
crossing approximately 0.76 mile from the Fort Bend-Austin Coun-
ty Line.
From the Brazos River to the San Bernard River, the alternate
measures approximately 17.1 miles. It commences at the Brazos
River, proceeding due south 1.1 miles to the crossing of State
Highway 36, said crossing approximagely 1.34 miles east of the
Highway’s junction with the Fort Bend-Austin County Line and
approximately 1.60 miles west of the State Highway 36-FM 1489 in-
tersection. Immediately after crossing Highway 36, the alternate
route makes a slight turn to the southeast and proceeds to the
southeast for approximately 2.9 miles to its erasing point on FM
1489, said crossing located adjacent to and east of the FM 1489-FM
1952 intersection; thence continuing southeast for approximately
1.2 miles to a turning point; thence turning basically south and
proceeding 0.9 mile to the crossing point of U.S. Highway 90A, said
crossing approximately 0.63 east of the U.S. 90A-FM 1952 inter-
section; thence continuing south approximately 0.6 mile to a slight
angle point and continuing basically south, crossing Turkey
Creek, approximately 0.8 mile to another small angle point; thence
due south approximately 3.5 miles to a turning point; thence tur-
ning southeast and proceeding 0.7 mile to the crossing of the
Southern Pacific Railroad and U.S. Highway 59, said erasing ap-
proximately 1.32 miles east of the U.S. 59 crossing of Brooks Bran-
ch in Kendleton and approximately 2.51 miles west of the U.S. 59-
FM 360 junction; thence continuing southeast 1.7 miles to a tur-
ning point; thence turning south-southwest and proceeding appro-
ximately 2.6 miles, crossing the San Bernard River twice, to a tur-
ning point; thence turning sou th-southeast and proceeding approx-
imately 0.6 mile to another turning point; thence turning south-
southwest again and proceeding 0.5 to the third crossing of the San
Bernard River.
From the San Bernard River to the Colorado River, the alternate
route measures approximately 16.8 miles. Commencing at the San
Bernard River crossing, the alternate continues in a south-
southwest direction for 0.9 mile to its crossing of West Bernard
Creek; thence continuing south-southwest approximately 2.1 miles
to a turning point; thence turning southwest and proceeding appro-
ximately 1.2 miles to the crossing of Peach Creek; thence con-
tinuing south-southwest approximately 0.6 mile to a turning point;
thence turning basically south and proceeding approximately 1.5
miles to the crossing of FM 1301 and the Southern Pacific Railroad,
said crossing approximately 3.62 miles east of the corporate boun-
dary of the city of Wharton; thence basically south for approxi-
mately 2.3 miles (including two small angles) to a turning point
immediately north of FM 3012; thence turning southwest, crossing
FM 3012 approximately 1.54 miles northwest of the road’s intersec-
tion with Water Hole Creek, and proceeding 1.0 mile to another
turning point; thence turning south-southwest and proceeding ap-
proximately 1.6 miles to the crossing point of State Highway 60,
said crossing 0.6 mile southeast of the Highway 60-FM 1299 inter-
section; thence continuing basically south-southwest for ap-
proximately 2.9 miles to a turning point; thence turning
basically south and proceeding approximately 2.7 miles to the
crossing of the Colorado River, said crossing approximately 3.44
miles southwest of the community of Lane City.
From the Colorado River to the South Texas Project, the alter-
nate route measures approximately 27.0 miles. Near the South
Texas Project, the alternate route’s alignment is the same as that
described for the proposed route. The final portion of the alternate
route commences at the Colorado River and proceeds south ap-
proximately 2.6 miles to a turning point located approximately 0.14
mile north of Jones Creek and approximately 0.61 mile west of the
Colorado River; thence turning south-southwest, parallel to an ex-
isting transmission line, and proceeding approximately 3.2 miles
and crossing Jones Creek, Dry Creek, and Blue Creek, said crossing
of Blue Creek approximately 0.39 mile north of the Wharton-
Matagorda County Line; thence continuing south-southwest 0.5
(Continued on page 5)
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Newspaper.
The New Ulm Enterprise (New Ulm, Tex.), Vol. 75, No. 29, Ed. 1 Thursday, May 16, 1985, newspaper, May 16, 1985; New Ulm, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1207658/m1/4/?q=%22%22~1: accessed July 17, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting Nesbitt Memorial Library.