Texas Register, Volume 38, Number 47, Pages 8313-8478, November 22, 2013 Page: 8,349
This periodical is part of the collection entitled: Texas Register and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
(2) The etumulative score requirement for a student on the
MMSP is based on the number of courses speifically listed as a re-
quirement of the MUSP and for which an EO assessment exists If
a student tkes a course that is not specifically listed as a requirement
of the MUSP and the student takes the applicable ~O assessment as
listed in the TE'f 39.023(c), the student will have the option of us-
ing the EOG assessment score toward the student's cumulative sore
SExceptions related to English I and retest require-
ments and the use of English I and II E assessment results in the
umulaTtive s~ re requirement shall apply to English language learners
who meet the criteria specified in -x.O1007n7 of this title (relating to
Assessment Provisions for Graduatisn)j1
1(4) If a student is not administered an EOf assessment as
specified by 321(e) of this titles the cumulative sere rireqre-
ment for the student shall be modified accordinly
(A) The student shall be administered the applicable
EOG assessment during an administration upon request.]
[(B The EO assessment result may count toward the
student's cumulative score nly if the soere is at or above the passing
standard as set by the commissioner f education
(d) [(c-)] If a student failed a course but achieved satisfactory
performance [at least the minimum score] on the applicable EOC as-
sessment, that student is not required to retake the assessment if the
student is required to retake the course.
101.3023. Participation and[,-] Graduation Assessment[,- and Cu-
mulative Seore] Requirements for Students Receiving Special Educa-
tion Services.
(a) As stipulated by 89.1070 of this title (relating to Gradu-
ation Requirements) [and 1o1 7 f ths title relating to Testing Re-
ti-ruee flts for Graduation)], a student receiving special education ser-
vices under the Texas Education Code (TEC), Chapter 29, Subchap-
ter A, who successfully completes the requirements of his or her indi-
vidualized education program (IEP), including performance on a state
assessment required for graduation, shall receive a Texas high school
diploma. A student's admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) commit-
tee shall determine if the student will be required to meet satisfactory
performance on an assessment for purposes of graduation.
(b) Beginning with the 2011-2012 school year, all Grades 9-12
students with significant cognitive disabilities who are assessed with an
alternate assessment as specified in the student's IEP will be assessed
using alternate versions of end-of-course (EOC) assessments as listed
in 101.3011(b)(2) of this title (relating to Implementation and Admin-
istration of Academic Content Area Assessment Instruments).
(c) A student who is receiving special education services un-
der the TEC, Chapter 29, Subchapter A, and who is first enrolled in
Grade 9 or below in the 2011-2012 school year shall be administered
[an alternative version of] an EOC assessment instrument upon com-
pletion of the corresponding course as required by the student's IEP.
t(4) If a student who is receiving special education services
und the TtC her 29 Subhapter A is administered; an alterna-
ti~e form of an EOG assessment as specified in 01.3011 of this title
the 15% urse grade requirement of the TEC ~3023(), shall not be
applied and a eumtl~a~tive scre shall not be reported ]
(e) Ifa student receiving speciat education services meets the
participation requirements for an alternative form of an EOG assess-
ment and is enrolled in a course for which there is an EOG assessment
btt no earresponding alternative version ofthat assessment the sftuent
is not required to take an assessment for that course.() If a student is administered a general O- assessment as
listed d in the TG 39.023(), the 45% course grade requirement as re-
quired by the TE 39023(), and specified in 11301 () of this
title (relating to Required Participation in Academi ntent Area As-
sessments and se Gradinig) shall apply an and a cumulative score shall
be repoed for the student in accordance with -10 !.3022 of this ti-
tie (relating to Assessment and Gumulative Score Reqirements for
The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the pro-
posal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on November 8,
2013.
TRD-201305166
Cristina De La Fuente-Valadez
Director, Rulemaking
Texas Education Agency
Earliest possible date of adoption: December 22, 2013
For further information, please call: (512) 475-1497
CHAPTER 149. COMMISSIONER'S RULES
CONCERNING EDUCATOR STANDARDS
SUBCHAPTER BB. ADMINISTRATOR
STANDARDS
19 TAC 149.2001
The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes new 149.2001,
concerning principal standards. The proposed new section
would implement the requirements of the Texas Education Code
(TEC), 21.3541.
The proposed new principal standards have been developed
pursuant to the TEC, 21.3541, requiring a collaborative stake-
holder process led by the commissioner of education to review,
revise, and align all policies and guidelines for Texas principals.
TEA staff participated in a multi-year project facilitated by the
Alliance to Reform Education Leadership at the George W. Bush
Institute, resulting in a set of recommended principal standards
and indicators to be used as guidelines to inform all aspects of
the principal position, from initial training through appraisal and
continuous improvement.
Proposed new 19 TAC Chapter 149, Commissioner's Rules
Concerning Educator Standards, Subchapter BB, Administrator
Standards, 149.2001, Principal Standards, would establish
standards in the areas of instructional leadership, human capital,
executive leadership, school culture, and strategic operations
and provide indicators of achievement with regard to those
standards.
The proposed new section would have no procedural or reporting
implications. The proposed new section would have no locally
maintained paperwork requirements.
Michele Moore, associate commissioner for educator leadership
and quality, has determined that for the first five-year period the
new section is in effect there will be no additional costs for state
or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the
new section.PROPOSED RULES November 22, 2013 38 TexReg 8349
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This issue can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Periodical.
Texas. Secretary of State. Texas Register, Volume 38, Number 47, Pages 8313-8478, November 22, 2013, periodical, November 22, 2013; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth379965/m1/37/?rotate=180: accessed July 18, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.