Legislative Summary Document - Texas Ethics Commission Page: 2 of 3
This report is part of the collection entitled: Texas State Auditor's Office: Reports and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Texas Ethics Commission
SAO Contact: Valerie Hill
(512) 936-9500Most Recent Performance Measure Certification
Fiscal Year 1998-Fiscal Year 2003
The results included in An Audit Report on Fiscal Year 2001 Performance Measures at 14 Entities (Report No. 03-008,
November 2002) for this entity are summarized below.
Period Goal/Strategy Measure Certification Results
2001 A Information on Government Percent of Sworn Complaints Resolved Within 180 Days of Inaccurate
Receipt
2001 A.1.2 Advise Public Average Time (Working Days) to Respond to Legal Advisory Inaccurate
Opinion Requests
2001 A.1.3 Enforcement Number of Sworn Complaints Processed Inaccurate
2001 A.1.3 Enforcement Average Time (Working Days) to Respond to Sworn Complaints Inaccurate
Total Measures Certified Without Qualification a 0/4 (0%)
Data Reliability Percentage (Certified and Certified with Qualification) 0/4 (0%)
a The percentage of unqualified certifications is presented because it is used in determining an entity's eligibility for performance rewards
as established in the General Appropriations Act [77th Legislature, Article IX, Sec. 6.31(d)(2)].Category
Definition
Certified Reported performance is accurate within +/-5 percent, and controls appear adequate to ensure accurate
collection and reporting of performance data.
Certified with Qualification Reported performance is within +/-5 percent, but the controls over data collection and reporting are not
adequate to ensure the continued accuracy of performance data.
Factors Prevent Certification Actual performance cannot be determined because of inadequate controls and insufficient documentation.
Inaccurate Reported performance is not within +/-5 percent of actual performance, or there is an error rate of at least 5
percent in the supporting documentation.
Not Applicable IA justifiable reason exists for not reporting performance.January 2003
SAO No. 03-393
-2-
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Texas. Office of the State Auditor. Legislative Summary Document - Texas Ethics Commission, report, February 2003; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth517784/m1/2/?rotate=90: accessed July 16, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.