A Legislative Summary Document Regarding Midwestern State University Page: 3 of 3
3 p.View a full description of this report.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Midwestern State University
SAO Contact: Susan Riley
(512) 936-9500A Review of State Entity Compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act
(Report. No. 02-039, May 2002)
Midwestern State University (University) did not complete a compliance audit as required by the Public Funds Investment
Act. University management reported extraordinary circumstances that delayed compliance. The University's internal auditor
was involved almost full-time in work for the University Board of Regents involving an investigation. After completing the
investigation, the internal auditor resigned.Most Recent Performance Measure Certification
Fiscal Year 1998-Fiscal Year 2003
The results of An Audit Report on Performance Measures at 25 State Agencies and Educational Institutions-Phase 14
(Report No. 01-007, November 2000) for this entity are summarized below.Period
Goal/Strategy
1999 A Instruction/Operations
1999 A Instruction/Operations
1999 A Instruction/Operations
1999 A Instruction/OperationsMeasure
State Pass Rate of Education ExCET Exam
Percent of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree-Seeking
Freshmen Who Earn a Baccalaureate Degree Within Six
Academic Years
Retention Rate of First-Time, Full-Time, Degree Seeking
Freshmen After One Academic Year
Percent of Lower Division Courses Taught by Tenured or
u Tenure-Track FacultyCertification Results
Certified with Qualification
Inaccurate
Certified with Qualification
InaccurateTotal Measures Certified Without Qualification a 0/4 (0%)
Data Reliability Percentage (Certified and Certified with Qualification) 2/4 (50%)
a The percentage of unqualified certifications is presented because it is used in determining an entity's eligibility for performance rewards
as established in the General Appropriations Act [77th Legislature, Article IX, Sec. 6.31(d)(2)].
Category Definition
Certified Reported performance is accurate within +/-5 percent, and controls appear adequate to ensure accurate
collection and reporting of performance data.
Certified with Qualification Reported performance is within +/-5 percent, but the controls over data collection and reporting are not
adequate to ensure the continued accuracy of performance data.
Factors Prevented Actual performance cannot be determined because of inadequate controls and insufficient documentation.
Certification
Inaccurate Reported performance is not within +/-5 percent of actual performance, or there is an error rate of at least 5
percent in the supporting documentation.
Not Applicable A justifiable reason exists for not reporting performance.January 2003
SAO No. 03-330
-3-
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Texas. Office of the State Auditor. A Legislative Summary Document Regarding Midwestern State University, report, February 2003; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth517835/m1/3/: accessed July 16, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.