Updating the Hydrogeologic Framework for the Northern Portion of the Gulf Coast Aquifer Page: VIII
This report is part of the collection entitled: Texas State Publications and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Final Report- Updating the Hydrogeologic Framework for the Northern Portion of the Gulf Coast Aquifer
Figure 5-1 Schematic cross section showing small-scale depositional cycles
(parasequences) and larger-scale sequence bounded by maximum flooding
surfaces ............................................................................................................... 5-8
Figure 5-2 Schematic cross section showing correlation strategies ...................................... 5-8
Figure 5-3 Schematic cross section comparing (a) chronostratigraphic correlation to
(b) lithostratigraphic correlation.........................................................................5-9
Figure 6-1 Stratigraphic column showing correlations among age, geologic
formations, hydrogeologic units, paleomarkers, and relative change of
coastal onlap ........................................................................................................ 6 -9
Figure 6-2 Contours for the Oakville geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation and
(b) thickness ...................................................................................................... 6-10
Figure 6-3 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section 9 in Figure
1 -1 . ..................................................................................................................... 6 -1 1
Figure 6-4 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section 7 in Figure
1 -1 . ..................................................................................................................... 6 -1 2
Figure 6-5 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section 5 in Figure
1 -1 . ..................................................................................................................... 6 -1 3
Figure 6-6 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section 3 in Figure
1-1 ...................................................................................................................... 6 -14
Figure 6-7 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section 1 in Figure
1 -1 . ..................................................................................................................... 6 -1 5
Figure 6-8 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near dip section -1 in Figure
1 -1 ...................................................................................................................... 6 -1 6
Figure 6-9 Vertical cross-section of the geological units near strike section B-B' ............ 6-17
Figure 6-10 Contours for the lower Lagarto geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation
and (b) thickness............................................................................................... 6-18
Figure 6-11 Contours for the Jasper Aquifer showing: (a) base elevation and (b)
thickn ess............................................................................................................. 6 -19
Figure 6-12 Contours for the middle Lagarto Formation, which is associated with the
Burkeville Unit, showing: (a) base elevation and (b) thickness ....................... 6-20
Figure 6-13 Contours for the upper Lagarto geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation
and (b) thickness............................................................................................... 6-2 1
Figure 6-14 Contours for the lower Goliad geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation
and (b) thickness............................................................................................... 6-22
Figure 6-15 Contours for the upper Goliad geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation
and (b) thickness............................................................................................... 6-23
Figure 6-16 Contours for the Evangeline Aquifer showing: (a) base elevation and (b)
thickness................................................ 6-24
Figure 6-17 Contours for the Willis geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation and (b)
thickness................................................ 6-25
Figure 6-18 Contours for the Lissie geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation and (b)
thickness................................................ 6-26
Figure 6-19 Contours for the Beaumont geologic unit showing: (a) base elevation and
(b) thickness.............................................. 6-27
Figure 6-20 Contours for the Chicot Aquifer showing: (a) base elevation and (b)
thickness................................................ 6-28viii
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This report can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Matching Search Results
View one page within this report that match your search.Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Report.
Young, Steven C.; Ewing, Tom; Hamlin, Scott; Baker, Ernie & Lupton, Daniel. Updating the Hydrogeologic Framework for the Northern Portion of the Gulf Coast Aquifer, report, June 2012; Austin, Texas. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth542209/m1/10/?q=%22~1~1~1~1%22~1: accessed July 16, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting UNT Libraries Government Documents Department.