6 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 6

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens stating he does not agree with Stephens' interpretation of another case against the Gulf Pipe Line Company as it requires too much of both parties involved. Sayles believes the trial judge may reset the time of the hearing during the same term of court.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Item Type: Refine your search to only Letter
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, June 18, 1930]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton case. Sayles states that the way he received continuance of the case was to transfer them to the 104th District Court and to give Fulton a quick trial. He states there may be difficulty in postponing these cases.
Date: June 18, 1930
Creator: Sayles, John
Item Type: Refine your search to only Letter
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library

[Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel, June 18, 1932]

Description: Letter from John Sayles to T. H. Neel in which John Sayles is asking if Mr. Neel is the attorney for N. E. Fielding. If Mr. Neel is the attroney John Sayles ask for home to sign and return an agreement for the resetting of the Sam Underwood et al vs. Gulf Refining Company court case.
Date: June 18, 1932
Creator: Sayles, John
Item Type: Refine your search to only Letter
Partner: Hardin-Simmons University Library
Back to Top of Screen