100 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 24 next

[Affidavit of Stefanie Held]

Description: Affidavit of Stefanie Held's statement on Dallas Gay Alliance v Parkland Hospital.
Date: September 23, 1988
Partner: UNT Libraries Special Collections

From the Didaskalia No. 263 of 23rd September 1846

Description: Excerpt from the Didaskalia claiming that the colonists bound for Castroville has been "seduced" by Castro. Once they arrived in Texas had no help from him and were dying of thirst and hunger. Dated September 23, 1846.
Date: September 23, 1846
Partner: The Dolph Briscoe Center for American History

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-098

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a justice court may issue a tax warrant under Tax Code section 33.22(a) in excess of $5,000 (ID# 38763)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-099

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a local taxing authority may, without foreclosing on the property , accept an amount that is less than the total amount of delinquent taxes owed on real property with "serious environmental problems" (RQ-880)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-100

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a county civil service system the personnel of a county attorney's even though Government Code section 41.105 deems the county attorney's personnel terminable at will (RQ-891)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-101

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a physician's employee who is not certified under the Medical Radiologic Technologist Certification Act, V.T.C.S. art. 4512m, is authorized to perform sinus and skull x-rays under the supervision of the physician (ID# 38836)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-102

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Effect of provision of chapter 611, Health and Safety Code, authorizing mental health professional to disclose confidential information about a patient in response to a subpoena (ID# 38823)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-103

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification;Regulation of Kinesiotherapists under article 4512e V.T.C.S and related questions(ID# 38920)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-104

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether the Beeville-Bee County Redevelopment Authority Corporation is subject to the Open Meetings Act, Gov’t Code ch. 551 (ID# 38963)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: LO96-105

Description: Letter opinion issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Whether, under Probate Code section 887, a debtor pay pay money to a county clerk for the benefit of a creditor if the creditor is owed, from all sources, a total greater than $25,000 and related question (ID# 38724)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-413

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether a county is liable for the payment of medical expenses that a county jail inmate who is not an eligible county resident under chapter 61 of the Health and Safety Code incurs (RQ-685, ID#27238)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-414

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the state constitutionally may implement , as part of its vehicle emissions inspection and maintenant program, a federal requirement that the state temporarily may suspend station or inspector licenses immediately upon finding a violation of … more
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-415

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the practice of acupuncture is within the scope of practice for a licensed Texas chiropractor and related questions (RQ-853)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-416

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the Texas Optometry Board may adopt a rule authorizing a therapeutic optometrist to administer cocaine eye drops for diagnostic purposes (RQ-877)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-417

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether Government Code section 822.201(c) constitutionally excludes from salary and wages, for purposes of determining member contributions to and computation of benefits from the Teacher Retirement System, "payments recieved... for teaching a driver… more
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-418

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether section 44.031 of the Education Code, enacted by act of May 27, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 260, ∫ 1, 1995 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 2207, 2425-26, changes the conclusion reached in Attorney General Opinion DM-347 (1995) and related questions (RQ-83… more
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: DM-419

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Dan Morales, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation may garnish the wages of a county employee for the purpose of collecting a federally guaranteed student loan (RQ-803)
Date: September 23, 1996
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-765

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Whether the fact that Vernon W. Dozier and Rosetta Bryant filed joint income tax returns as husband and wife is sufficient proof that Dozier and Rosetta entered into a common law marriage so as to classify Rosetta as Class "A" beneficiary
Date: September 23, 1966
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-766

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Questions relating to taking blood samples from a person suspected of driving while under the influence of intoxicating beverages.
Date: September 23, 1966
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: C-767

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Waggoner Carr, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification; Timeliness and legal sufficiency of submitted petition of an independent candidate for office of Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1 of Jim Wells County.
Date: September 23, 1966
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: M-280

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Validity of a certain expenditure restriction contained in the general appropriations bill, which restrictions were vetoed by the Governor.
Date: September 23, 1968
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department

Texas Attorney General Opinion: M-280A

Description: Document issued by the Office of the Attorney General of Texas in Austin, Texas, providing an interpretation of Texas law. It provides the opinion of the Texas Attorney General, Crawford Martin, regarding a legal question submitted for clarification: Validity of certain expenditure restrictions contained in the general appropriations bill, which restrictions were vetoed by the Governor.
Date: September 23, 1968
Creator: Texas. Attorney-General's Office.
Partner: UNT Libraries Government Documents Department
Back to Top of Screen