Criminality, Social Disruption and Homosexuality Page: 2 of 3
1 pamphlet : ill. ; 22 x 51 cm., folded to 22 x 11 cm.View a full description of this pamphlet.
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
We come into the world owing a debt - to our
parents who bore us and the society which
sustains both them and us. It grows as we are fed,
housed and educated. Responsible hetero-
sexuality figures large in the repayment scheme.
Starting with gainful employment and moving
into high gear with marriage and child rearing,
debt reduction takes time. By old age, however,
the adequately socialized have repaid it with
interest. Well raised children are not only a
personal blessing but a major part of the
satisfaction of just social obligation.
Those with destructive habits cost society as
well as themselves. As a class, those with the bad
habit of smoking tobacco undoubtedly
contribute more than they cost society, but non-
smokers yield the same benefits while generating
none of the liabilities (e.g., extra fires, higher
disease rates). Those with the very bad habit of
drug addiction probably cost society more than
they contribute due to their absenteeism,
accidents, instability and generalized propensity
to criminality. Homosexuals, like others addicted
to very bad habits, are a net burden on society.
Gays contribute less and cost more than their
heterosexual counterparts.
Four major studies allow a comparison of
homosexuals with heterosexuals - and all
generated results suggesting greater social
disruption on the part of gays. Kinsey's study of
volunteers uncovered a strong association
between homosexuality and criminality. General
prison inmates (excluding those incarcerated for
sexual offenses) were over 4 times more apt to
have extensive homosexual experience than his
control group'. Saghir & Robins 2 compared 146
gay volunteers with 78 heterosexuals and
reported less stability (more lovers, more job-
changing) and more criminality among
homosexuals. Bell & Weinberg 3 contrasted 979
volunteer gays with 477 randomly-obtained
'mainly heterosexuals' and found more instability
(psychiatric, marital) and more criminality
among gays. Cameron & Ross 4 questionnaired
2,251 randomly-obtained respondents and
reported more social cohesion (numbers and
kinds of intimates), less self-destruction
(smoking, drug use, suicide attempts), and less
endangerment of others (via driving habits,
deliberate killing) among heterosexuals.To systematically expand upon these findings,
the Institute for the Scientific Investigation of
Sexuality (ISIS) performed a random study of
4,340 adults from 5 cities (L.A., Denver, Omaha,
Louisville, Washington, D.C.) in 1983. In the
following summary of findings, those who
currently claimed exclusive heterosexuality are
compared with those who claimed to currently
practice homosexual acts [some heterosexuals are
ex-gays, some gays are ex-heterosexuals]. Rates
for each gender of exclusive heterosexuals for
each variable were summed and divided by 2,
and compared with the sum of rates of each
gender of homosexual practitioners divided by 2
(thus for 'ever having had a sexually transmitted
disease' 49.5% of male and 33.0% of female
heterosexuals reported one or more, compared to
79.7% of male and 45.5% of female bi/homosexuals
for comparative rates of 41.3% and 62.6%
respectively).
Homosexuals Lower the Public Health
* by direct infection of others
-gays were 52% more apt to report having had
at least one sexually transmitted disease [41.3%
hetero vs 62.6% homo] and 245% more apt to
report 2 or more such diseases [19.1% vs 46.7%]
-gays were 414% more apt to report deliberate
infection of others [1.4% hetero vs 5.8% homo]
* by using and modeling the use of dangerous
substances
-62% more gays reported regularly getting high
on drugs or alcohol [28.9% hetero vs 46.8%
homo]
-gays, 20% more frequently, reported regular
tobacco smoking [36.9% hetero vs 44.1% homo]
* by endangering and harming others on the
highways
-22% more gays reported having obtained at
least one traffic ticket while they were the
principal driver in the past 5 years [43.2% vs
52.8%] and 22% more reported having obtained
at least 2 tickets [21.3% vs 25.9%]
-31% more gays reported at least one auto
accident in the past 5 years [34.0% vs 45.4%]
while 64% more homosexuals reported 2 or
more accidents [10.4% hetero vs 17.0% homo]
-13% fewer gays reported never driving care-
lessly [27.6% hetero vs 23.9% homo] but there
was virtually no difference in always using a
seat belt [16.7% hetero vs 16.5% homo]* by being more frequently involved in murder,
suicide, and violence
-171% more gays have attempted suicide [7.5%
hetero vs 20.3% homo]
-40% more gays admitted to deliberately killing
or attempting to kill others (military service is
not excluded, and proportionately many
fewer homosexuals than normals have
served) [6.8% vs 9.5%]. Little wonder that
about two-thirds of the victims of sexually-
related mass murders in the past 17 years in
the U.S. have died at the hands of
homosexuals 5.
-49% more gays admitted to having been in a
physical fight in the past year [11.1% hetero
vs 16.5% homo]
Homosexuality Reduces Social Cohesion
And Trust
" in public ways
-5% of divorces in the ISIS study involved
homosexuality
-8% more gays admitted to have gotten in
trouble at school for something they did
[63.6% vs 68.4%]
-16% more gays reported having been arrested
for a non-sexual, non-traffic crime [13.8% vs
16.0%]
-557% more gays reported having been arrested
for a sexual crime [.7% hetero vs 4.6% homo]
-8% more gays admitted conviction for a non-
sexual, non-traffic crime [6.7% hetero vs 7.2%
homo]
-575% more gays admitted conviction for a
sexual crime [.4% hetero vs 2.7% homo]
-74% more gays reported having been jailed or
imprisoned [7.7% hetero vs 13.4% homo]
* In covert ways
-41% more gays admitted to shoplifting [44.6%
hetero vs 62.8% homo]
-67% more gays admitted to cheating on their
income tax [11.4% hetero vs 18.0% homo]
-32% more gays admitted to not having been
caught for a non-traffic, non-sexual crime
[24.4% hetero vs 32.1% homo]
-481% more gays admitted to not having been
caught for a sex crime [3.7% hetero vs
21.5% homo]
* gays more frequently violate positions of
public trust for sexual advantage (while
bi/homosexuals make up no more than 5%, andprobably closer to 3% of the population,
consider these reports by our sample):
-29% of sexual advances and 25% of actual
sexual contacts between elementary teachers
and their pupils involved homosexuality
-16% of sexual advances and 22% of sexual
contact between secondary teachers and their
pupils involved homosexuality
-11% of sexual advances, 14% of sex between
citizens and police were homosexual
-8% of sexual advances, 9% of sex between
employers/supervisors and employees were
homosexual
-7% of advances, 12% of contacts between
stepparents and children were homosexual
-15% of sexual approaches, 8% of actual sexual
contacts by religious workers were
homosexual
-11% of advances, 16% of contacts with relatives
were homosexual
* Sometimes we must be nude or semi-nude in
group settings. "Time out" from sexuality is a
requirement of good social order. Only 3% of
normals claimed pleasure and 74% displeasure
from being ogled by a homosexual in such a
circumstance while 69% of homosexual
practitioners claimed pleasure and 13%
displeasure in the same setting.
Gays don't call normals straights without reason.
Homosexuality Preys On,
Heterosexuality Creates And Nurtures Children
e heterosexuals were 229% more apt to have
children [66.7% vs 29.1%]
-of those married with children, gays were
245% more apt to claim to be reluctant parents
[5.1% hetero vs 17.6% homo]
-of those married without children, hetero-
sexuals were 23% more apt to be reluctantly
childless [54.1% hetero vs 41.7% homo]
-of those single, gays were 33% less apt to want
children [78.0% vs 52.1%]
* homosexuality has been implicated in between
a third to a half of all recorded cases of child
molestation 6, further,
-homosexuals were 62% more likely to admit
to sex with children under the age of 13 [1.3%
hetero vs 2.1% homo] and 87% more apt to
report sex with those under the age of 16 [7.0%
hetero vs 13.5% homo]* when asked about their first sexual contact with
an adult
-40.4% of the molestations by men against those
under the age of 12 were against boys (29.6%
of the molestation by women was against
girls)
-33.3% of the molestations of youth under the
age of 14 by men were against boys (20.7% of
those by women were against girls)
* 3.1% of the men reported that they had been
molested by a man before the age of 13 [and
over a third of these eventually became bi- or
homosexual]. 6.8% of women claimed that they
had been molested by a man before the age of
13. Thus 31% of those claiming molestation by
men before they had reached age 13 were
homosexually assaulted.
* in a random survey of 15 to 19 year olds in Great
Britain, 35% of the boys and 9% of the girls
reported that they had been approached for sex
by adult homosexuals; 2% of the boys and 1% of
the girls admitted to succumbing '
Homosexuality breeds a predatory, hetero-
sexuality a nurturant attitude toward children.
German History Repeats Itself In The US
Gay rights began in Germany at the turn of the
century. By 1923 there were over 25 national
organizations and 33 periodicals catering to
homosexuals s and gays were seeking a political
party to carry their lifestyle to power. They threw
their weight behind the Nazis and were rewarded
with leadership of the stormtroopers (SA) 9. Over
time, Nazi youth organizations and camps
became notorious for homosexual molestation.
Open homosexuality, pornography, drugs and
prostitution turned Berlin into the San Francisco
of Europe. Confronting a deteriorating social
situation, Hitler betrayed his gay comrades and
moved forcefully against homosexuals in 1934. In
one of the ironic twists of history, gays became
some of the first inmates of the death camps they
helped to create!
Perfect parallel between the U.S. and Hitler's
Germany is absent. But what about the scientific
findings above suggests that all previous
civilizations erred in their suppression of
homosexuality? Gays are corrupt and corrupting.
Allowed free reign, homosexual values will trash
any society in which they are allowed to flourish.
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This pamphlet can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Pamphlet.
Institute for the Scientific Investigation of Sexuality. Criminality, Social Disruption and Homosexuality, pamphlet, 1985; Lincoln, Nebraska. (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc276206/m1/2/: accessed June 6, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu; crediting UNT Libraries Special Collections.