[Cause 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion for Rehearing] Page: 1 of 2
This legal document is part of the collection entitled: Sayles and Sayles Collection and was provided to The Portal to Texas History by the Hardin-Simmons University Library.
- Highlighting
- Highlighting On/Off
- Color:
- Adjust Image
- Rotate Left
- Rotate Right
- Brightness, Contrast, etc. (Experimental)
- Cropping Tool
- Download Sizes
- Preview all sizes/dimensions or...
- Download Thumbnail
- Download Small
- Download Medium
- Download Large
- High Resolution Files
- IIIF Image JSON
- IIIF Image URL
- Accessibility
- View Extracted Text
Extracted Text
The following text was automatically extracted from the image on this page using optical character recognition software:
Lea 4 fl t " ( \) 2P)'
iS TilA C UThA y CIVIL APPEL>
5i7"vTH 3 SUPUME JUDICIAL DISTRICT O' TXAS
AT EASLAND.
*e * * * * **
~LIttl4 L~I CIY ILtivLU Ii Ux OIL kJIIWAIY,
Appellant,
vs.
. . BAi3IT;eRI ,
Ap pollee.
A PPLLAT 'S APPLY T O ATDELEE S LOT 1Q1 FOP R ArI7\5NG.
TO Sl 1&141{IBLE COURT:
in reply to appellee's motion for rehearing, appellant relies
upon the cases of Clonts vs. Johnson, (Comm. App.) 294 a."h.W4A,
and Texas & N.0.R. Co. vs. thisenant, 105 3.W. (zd ) 70).
Th'e first above nent<.oned case ;s cited h this Honorable
ft' inis opinion-in t on'. s aosend ts dir.ctly in coint. tje
iecoa ii ',e eiOn is en opinion ' te 13Ea3nt Q't of
Civil appeals, 1 w ich follows the case C.Clon v os. Jhns on, sitpra.
As stated in Clonts vs. Johnson, spray, in the absence of a
ontrary showing in the record, it will be presu ed that the justice
and county courts had jurisdiction. , ith this presumption obtain-
ing, the Court of Civil Appeals has jurisdiction to review the
case on appeal.
Since there is no contrary showing sn The reca t in this c Gs,
it will be presumed that te justice ..n0 county courts hPs jurisw
Section and tha this onorabi e onrt likewise haS jurisit sn to
review this cso on a -pea.
Therefore, appellane, L.ntisn IerrL itory illuniatin il Co n,
prays that the motion for rehearing herein filed by appellee, be
in all things overruled and that all costs of such mot ion for r>.
hearing be adjudged against appellee herein.
Respectfully vuittod.
SAYLES & SAYLES
Ltuornays forrplt ;
Upcoming Pages
Here’s what’s next.
Search Inside
This document can be searched. Note: Results may vary based on the legibility of text within the document.
Tools / Downloads
Get a copy of this page or view the extracted text.
Citing and Sharing
Basic information for referencing this web page. We also provide extended guidance on usage rights, references, copying or embedding.
Reference the current page of this Legal Document.
Sayles, Jack. [Cause 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion for Rehearing], legal document, 1940~; (https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth1155035/m1/1/?q=%22%22~1: accessed July 4, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, The Portal to Texas History, https://texashistory.unt.edu.; crediting Hardin-Simmons University Library.